• Why I’m Running

Why I’m Running for District 24B State Representative


We’ve all dismissed the dire warnings from older generations about this nation spiraling into chaos, chalking it up to exaggeration or rose-tinted memories. Yet, with a national debt soaring to $37.8 trillion as of October 2025 and annual interest payments devouring $1 trillion, Congress exhibits no resolve to curb expenditures, alleviate tax burdens, or confine itself to its constitutional mandate. Historical precedents and straightforward reasoning foretell an inevitable catastrophe—not imminent, perhaps not within Gen Z’s span, but perilously probable for their descendants.

States remain the ultimate safeguard for individual liberties. Indeed, state governance plays a primary role in protecting citizens and preserving their rights. The state’s paramount—and singular—obligation is to protect life, liberty, and property. For Idaho to fulfill this enduringly, our administration must achieve fiscal stability, uphold what is verifiably true, aesthetically beautiful, and morally good, while adhering strictly to our God given freedom. These imperatives demand representatives who embody these convictions through action. Regrettably, my opponent has flagrantly deviated from this path, endorsing virtually every expenditure proposal and consistently championing legislation that inflates government far beyond its rightful scope.

We recognize the term RINO—Republican In Name Only—but the true threat to Idaho’s conservative ethos and freedom isn’t just influxes of liberal from California, Oregon, or Washington. It’s the entrenched establishment, masquerading as “moderates,” who boast of bipartisan compromise. When voters select a Republican, they believe the individual will vote in fidelity to the party’s platform. The platform is a statement of beliefs. When one calls themselves a Republican, that means they hold the same beliefs. Republicans must unwaveringly align with core principles; failure to do so disqualifies one from being a Republican. Has my opponent held Republican principles across his ten years?

The National Republican Party’s verdict is unequivocal: no, earning him a dismal D grade during the 2025 session. Their analyses reveal he opposed initiatives to “defeat inflation and swiftly reduce prices” 58.2% of the time, opposed efforts to “seal the border and halt the migrant invasion” in half of the instances, and thwarted measures to “forge the greatest economy in history” 61.54% of the time.

Most egregiously, he never supported Republican proposals to “revive the American dream and restore affordability.” In aggregate, he aligned with the National GOP principle a mere 68.49%—a failing performance (https://www.gopscorecard.com).

The Idaho Republican Party assigns him an outright F in District 24, with Republican aligned votes at just 56.8%. The GOP scrutinized votes on foundational issues such as self-defense rights, medical confidentiality, electoral integrity, and resistance to tax escalations or federal intrusions (https://idgopscorecard.com/2025-bill-analyses-and-ratings/).

Donate Today

Ready to make a real difference in Idaho’s future?
Your support can help bring bold, principled leadership to our state. Every contribution, big or small, counts

© 2025 Paid for by Isaac for Idaho, Isaac Moffett, Treasurer. All rights reserved.